Wednesday, January 26, 2011

virgin Suicides

Here are some started questions/ideas, some with partial/incomplete address regarding Virgin Suicides. I promise not to speak in anything but standard, contemporary English, though I would like to read the phrase "stone cold fox" used in some non-satiristic manner. 

(1) This is our first time to discuss specifics types of narrators doing the narrating within the narrative (notice that these differences are more than semantic; they are consequential). IN the novel, there is a quite new type of narrator, one who is both present and not present: he is the narrator in the (plural???) first person, yet he doesn't seem to be a character in the story (he is never directly addressed. How might we begin to account for this?

(1a) Connected to above, we could talk as to how the filmic version handles the odd narration of the book. Can you make an argument about the challenges for and responses of the film to the novel's narrating? 

(2) When texts use first-person narration (as the book does in a weird way), we might expect that voice to guide us through the story (to be sure), but we might also expect it to guide our responses to the story (i.e., to tell us how to feel or react to events). I will make the claim that the novel never does this. Defend or refute.

(3) We can also talk about the texts as being "about" nostalgia and memory every bit as much as they are stories of these girls.  Take an intellectual leap and address this idea.